And the game is always the same:
if someone says or remarkes anything the "Team" doesn't want to hear, there's always the same procedure:
Kyp answers in a way which shows he really isn't interested even to listen or think over the post carefully
C-Del is up to say just what Kyp wants to hear
Maniac hits the goal to say something to show he's with the "TEAM".
and Lannister? thought he were an advocate for the players, but seems he makes the loudspeaker for the T
As a matter of fact:
Mimir didn't say that Byakhee's missions affect the stability of the server,
he just pointed out that if there are so many things to do, why putting time in changing game and not first trying to get it running with the original content BEFORE you go on with content changing?
Changing the content at all means you change the game from a player focused game to a mission focused game (from excellent one to a pretty bad one imao, lots of better mission-based games on market)
And what about the original story-line? If you change the game there is no chance to get all the stuff ingame the westwood-studio was up to bring in further.
All the enb-missions kept alot of running, mining, building etc. no need to blame the progen-players and tell they won't do that running, mining, building...
I for myself always kept doing it till the missions were done, but what for?
Check the wonderful Bogeril missions: a great technology was born
remember the Maelstrom mission: how many runs and stuff were needed: i think neone was tired to grind it and do all the runs for it
but the aggrippa technology: a great idea but at the end to get the blueprint for a lv3 shield or a lv2 one if you go further... which neone wants for using ...
guess the market cries for it....
But even Agrippa technology were nice at all if we had at least the original Enb-Content fixed and running stable.
And so my Question too:
Why wasting time for bringing in new content BEFORE the game is properly running????
Mimir, you hit the point! THANK YOU VM