Jump to content

CliptraX

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    75.00 USD 

 Content Type 

Posts posted by CliptraX

  6. Posted

    Oke, the test works, it is impossible to enter the fishbowl without a full level 150 party. and it is very very hard to make a lvl 150 party these days. it would take hours, iff not days..There are not 70.000 gamers who would like to kill in the fb.i have a level 150 pw, and i dont know what to kill, 7000 chavez is an option.. but i dont have the time to do that.i dont what to be unpolite, but arnt there much more important things to work on, and i really appriciate the efford the hard work to all the people who are making it possible to play ENB.i really salute to them, keep on going!maybe we can get a bit more info, iff the fb or paramis is changed, let us know, and why you test it this way? then we can anticipate on that.saying "your complains are unfounded and won't be taken seriously" is not very kind, please, see it from an other point of few, think about it.sry for my bad english, i did my best.Greetings

    Why u think this is called stresstest? This is not supposed to be as comfortable as u would like it, that i can understand :)

    The universe is a harsh environment and sometimes u get a galactic earthquake. lol

    Guess we just have to change tactics.

    And don't think the devs wont react to this, just because they wont let us know.

  8. Posted

    well the guild I'm in had plenty of cash too and we raided all the time ... so eventually you got the loot awarded to you with no need for 1b creds... at sunset we had to have at least 7-8 accounts filled with bank toons just to store it all... when I was in charge of it... I couldn't give ubers away fast enough...and dont get me wrong... I dont want god mode... hell I would be happy with the exact JE configuration with one change... let me change my ship to look terran and my toon to look terran you can even call me a jenqui explorer... I just want toon look and ship config to my liking... keep in mind there is no war between the races... or overriding conflict, no jen or prog or ter restricted space to due race war... yeah the jens are a little pissed at the prog, and to the progs all jens are good for is dessert... so they will both be babies and not make one anothers items... but in the end, they are just petty restrictions which have invented ingame reasons with the real reason to appease people?...so let me rephrase "Would it really destroy the game if I could make a JE that looked like and had a ship that looked like a terran?"

    Let me get this right, u making all this noise because u want a cosmetic intervention?

    U would be perfectly happy with a JE if it would look like a terran?

    And u perfectly happy with the JE ship if it would look like a terran ship?

    U sure u dont wanna be a JE that looks like a Nightelf at daytime flying a JE ship that looks like a Golem?

    whats wrong with the jenquai look?

  9. Posted

    Can anybody explain to me what this is all about ?

    Are some people really think this game would be better if we where all the same? I can't hardly imagine that.

    I wonder why none of the Terran classes cna buld reactor.

    Did Terrans send their ships into space without anergy source?

    Must be, as they are race-inept of building reactors.

    This restriction makes no sense.

    And, honestly, who can build the most complex devices, shields and engines is definitely capable of doing a reactor. It's not that reactors are magic voodoo devides which can be made only by a shaman of a different reace through his magical non-terran powers.

    There is a very simple explanation for this. Most of the so called terran technologies are actually stolen from the Jenq and other races with help of the Progen forces. the next question would be how the jenq aquired all this tech. and how come the progen can build stuff at all in the first place, cause they only know how to shoot and stuff like that.

    Im kinda getting really bored right now. if i want a progen and a terran and a jenq i make one. It worked just fine for years on live. So what is the problem?

    Maybe one day, once we are live for a while we can evaluate, but even that would be more a job for the staff.

    The rest is politics and should really not be discussed on this forum :(

    • Upvote 1

  10. Posted

    I kinda understand both angles on this. U have to give parts of it away as an incentive, but u also have to keep the details hidden. The question is, where to draw the line?

    there is a good compromise on teh net7 db. also some important info is not directly accesible, like the missing list of Buff for an item in the itemlist, so that i can compare itembuffs on the fly, without switching back and forth all the time. There is also info available over who drops what in a sector. So if the map would connect to net7 db it could use all available info within the map that would include what to buy where and so forth. That way the devs keep control of what will be public. I would love to be able to make personal notes at specific locations about things i figured out. That would enable me to look up things on my map if i wanna help somebody else to find it.

    As u maybe noticed im talking in the I form, which means i am entirely speaking for myself. After i apologize for my bad english i would like to say that i found both tools (net7db and the interactive map) extremely usefull.

    live long and prospect

  15. Posted

    It is true that many players prefer to go against the grain and play solo, but it is also true that players that do will never achieve the same benefits of those that group.

    Since u will need facts, here are some. I have 3 accounts with EVE of which i only use 1 actively for about 12 hour a month lately. Im not swimming against the grain with this. cause multiboxing is encouraged by CCP. (prolly because it generates extra cash:) I play EVE 7 years the last 4 exclusively single in a one man corp. U can do that in EVE. as a matter of fact many players do. Put aside the fact that most of the stuff u buy on the market is made from other players there is not much interaction with others.

    The last 2 Years i run T-DOP as a production fascillity for t2 drones and ships in a small highsec system 2 hops from Jita. Refueling the POS and shuffling parts and products back and forth to Jita take me about 12 hours a month. My totall net annual profit is around 18.000.000.000, thats because im so lazy. More then 90% of all the other players never make that much, as u can see in the financial annual reports made available to everybody.

    I think it all has alot to do with personal insight and skill. If u have the skill to run multiple boxes and u are good enough at it to solo-group combat, that is skill and efford, its not an exploit. running multiple accounts on live on a single box was never a problem. It kinda became one with the net-7 startup, specially on vista and W7. still works like a charme on xp. without any VM. Never used it for more then extended storage anyway.

    To be totally honest this whole discussion about multiboxing makes no real sense to me. Neither does the macropart because i think most people mean bots if they say macro. Im not a native english speaker so this little differences are very important 4 me 2 understand what the subject is about. in order to judge propperly we also need a common frame of reference, which we obviously don't have at this moment. The fact that Macros (bots) and multiboxing are combined in this subject only adds to the confusion.

    I guess this is what u get if u want to achive to much too fast:)

    u all fly safe and fight victorious

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 2

  17. Posted

    With all due respect, the statements I have said in the prior post are and will always be facts. They are not assumptions. FACTS! Any logical thinking mind will come to the same conclusion, its common sense. Just as the sun is bright, and ice is cold, so are MMO's created for multi-player play. So, lets face the facts. Avani, you're just a troll...

    Since i miss the abillity to think logical, i figured that multiplayer games are designed to have multiple players taking part. That is the fact. Its like in real life. we also live on the same planet, but we mostly don't cooperate alot with each other. even worth, we mostly work against each other. It's ego and thats another fact. Many MMo's have no endgame, best example is EVE.It might be possible that many people still play mmo's to win. the question is only, what are they expect to win?

    the ting with the weather is, that if it rains the streets get wet. On the other side, if the street are wet it might not be from the rain. Yes mmo's are created for multiplayers, but that doesnt mean that they all play together.

    I personally like to play together with others as much as i like to play alone. even without the capacity to think logical i can imagine alot of people also behave this way.

    Maybe im a troll too??????

    u tell me Mort, because im obviously mentaly handicaped :)

  18. Posted

    Would i subscribe? no i wouldnt. Why would i leave a community that takes so much care to keep a game alive that otherwise would be dead ? For a crapload of flashy gimmiks, and another upset?

    This is not bashing. In my eyes its just simply telling the truth. So i rather stick to people with a heart.

    Loyalty 4tw and my respect to all who keep this emu ticking.

  19. Posted

    But I hold no animosity, it's simply the failings of human nature. Safe travels to you.

    Like i said its all between the ears. Yes we fail as humans because we try to compensate our natural incompetence with weapons and violence. We fight for peace while we all know that u wont "get" peace. It is something that u either have or u don't. Maybe it would be a good idea to have a closer look at home. and in gods name don't be so scared. Live is only a game :P it sux......... and then u die

    Btw. We have some nifty wartoys in europa too, but its not that our livelyhood depends on it. Besides that i never wanted US cruisemissiles in my backyard anyway. :) Its a matter of how I look at things.

    its all between the ears

  20. Posted

    Nice try Daywolf :) The only problem is that US troops in europe are not really defending anything and only cost the europeans lotsa money. (US actually get payed to be there)

    This compensation, they won't get anymore, so they end up with even less cash. Considering the amount of debts the US allready has , that would probately lead to more problems and leave europeans with an even bigger budget for even better healthcare :)

    But u kinda right, if the US would decrease millitary spendigs from roughly 75% to about 60% of the annual budget, they could offer free insurance to most people and even could sanitize the national debts.

    But that would probately raise the unemployment rates to soaring heights............. and so on and so on. I think the real problem is located between the ears.

    flame on, lol

    • Upvote 2
×
×
  • Create New...