Calatin
-
Posts
36 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
25.00 USD
Posts posted by Calatin
-
-
What I have found is that the game continually sends me back to the login screen, never allowing me to enter that first sector, if my resolution is set too high. 1920x1050 fails every time; 1600x900 is fine. I'm running Windows 7 64-bit. Hopefully this will help someone else...if you're hitting the "back to login screen" problem, try adjusting your resolution with ebconfig (as admin).
-
I think it's naive to believe you can have a strong PvP track that's "separate but equal" without affecting PvE. Why? Suddenly every decision has to made with the effect on PvP as a consideration. Want to create a new device that helps spot cloaked MOBs? Wait...how will that affect Jenquai combat balance in PvP? Want to create some cross-class interaction of skills to encourage PvE class mixing? Wait... will that create some unbalanced two-man team combination in PvP? Want to give away a nice piece of equipment from some uber-boss? Wait...will that make the owner unstoppable in PvP?
You devs will have a lot less latitude to try anything new when you have to also ensure that [i]every[/i] decision doesn't upset the PvP balance. If you haven't seen this at play in other games, you haven't been watching closely.
PvP can be a lot of fun, and human opponents will pull tricks that even the best AI will never try. But be wary of the handcuffs that come with it.-
2
-
-
I always thought that buffs should add "multiplicatively" rather than linearly, e.g. two 50% bufs would give you 75% resistance rather than 100%. Basically, each buff reduces your [i]remaining vulnerability[/i] by its percentage. Mathematically: 1-product(1-buffAmount) over all the devices.
The nice thing is that there's never "too much" or any need for an arbitrary cap -- diminishing returns is built in. You'll never hear someone say, "thanks, don't need your buff, I'm already at the cap." But it'd be a change, and it might make the mathematically challenged scratch their heads. ("How come 30%+40% is 58% and not 70%?") :-) (1-(1-.3)(1-.4)) -
[quote name='Crichton' timestamp='1323465230' post='49449']
There is no class in the game that has all positives and no negatives. It is a balance. As such at no point should explorers ever be allowed to make ammo. If they can then I want my warriors to be able to mine. However since this is an MMO there are two choice available: Group with other players that can assist you with making ammo/carrying ammo or make a secondary toon that can do this for you. In either case this is the basic design of the game. Learn to love it.....or you know.....find another game that doesn't require players to accept (and have to deal with) tradeoffs based on class decisions.
[/quote]
Crichton, while I agree half your post, allowing TS and PS to make their own ammo doesn't suddenly turn them into a war machine or give them "all positives and no negatives". They'd still be the weakest at combat. They'd still be unable to build components or repair shields. They'd still be rarely needed on raids. Do you really think that, given the ability to make their own ammo, everyone would abandon all the other classes to jump to TS/PS, as they would have no weaknesses?
This is not one of those tradeoffs you make such as, "if I play an explorer, I'm not going to be very good at combat". Instead, it's just an annoying, non-fun part of the game. "If I play an TS/PS, I sign myself up for a big PITA logistical problem." A good designer doesn't level the classes by making them less fun to play. (And I think the original designers even realized that they made a mistake with the PS, given the Archos ammo device.)
My original main is a PS, and I gave up on leveling combat once I hit 135. It just wasn't worth flying halfway across the galaxy every time I needed ammo. There's probably a lot of L135 PS out there.
-
Thanks, Talcon. 25 was a real stretch for me when I started this (I was CL16), so I probably only killed one or two Infinitcorp Bruisers before assuming that wasn't the right thing to do.
Does it give you a clue when the first power coupling drops, or do you need to collect a batch of them before you even know you're on the right track? (I don't remember seeing a popup.) -
I'm stumped. I've killed everything I can handle in Aganju (up to 25). I've carried around Grain & Reactor Waste. I've visited all the nav points there. I should have gotten screenshots of all the dialog, since I don't see any clues in the mission log.
"Is there anything else in Aganju that she likes?" Not that I can tell. -
The ironic thing about this discussion is that one of the things that made E&B stand out was that it [b]was[/b] very dynamic, especially compared to MMOs of today. Sectors would get taken over by the V'rix. Major characters would move around. Gates would open or threaten to open or close. The story moved. (And there was a fair amount of story there, though it didn't hit you in the head with it.)
In other words, it wasn't a static thing frozen in amber. So there isn't a E&B to recreate, per se. You could recreate the September 2002 version of the game, or the January 2003 version, or the September 2004 version; but if you wanted to recreate the real E&B feel, it would have to be dynamic.
____
(Not to dismiss the amazing, volunteer job done so far. I just challenge the idea that there is one golden paragon vision to recreate.) -
Of course the best way to solve this would be to change the signs on their kiosks, but that involves new graphics assets so becomes difficult.
If we want to talk realism, it would be more likely that a vendor would represent a particular company rather than a level of item. So you'd have to see the Evolver vendor for Evolver parts. Not that I'm suggesting that as a change. -
[quote name='Sharlot' timestamp='1304802783' post='40359']
Where is the level 75 bonus mission Crossdock Beta Technician?
[/quote]
Nostrand Vor southwest nav. -
It's no revelation that Westwood didn't intend to give [i]Build Weapons[/i] to scouts (and no one is asking for it, even today). Later in the game, they gave Sentinels a way to make their own ammunition for one (two?) types of guns. You might read into that that they realized their original design wasn't perfect.
However, the original question was about what works well and what doesn't, not about what the game did on paper, in Live, or even now. If the goal is simply to create a 100% accurate replica of the Live servers, there's really no need to ask any questions about how it could be improved. It is what it is, take it or leave it. -
1) PS Repulsor Field seems to work mechanically as a self-buf, but if you ever apply it while it's still up (or fading out), it removes the buf icon and the visual effect, even though it's still active. Once that happens, it's really hard to tell whether it's running or has faded away. (Unless you watch enemy damage numbers very closely.)
2) I've had a hard time applying Repulsor to others (upper levels). Does it only work for group members?
3) Nit: The Psi Shield's sound effect is constant and annoying. I know you can hack a file to make it go away, but I bet your community wouldn't mind if it were permanently turned down to almost-inaudible (except during start-up and fade-away).
Thanks! -
There seems to be a theme developing that "if you want to make it work smoothly, your TS needs a reliable always-ready supplier of ammo, which frequently (but not always) means an alt on a second account".
Some consider that a perfectly reasonable limitation.
Others find it to be an unnecessary pain that makes the class less enjoyable.
Neutral enough? -
[quote name='Kyp' timestamp='1303767954' post='39745']
Ammo only comes in 2 flavors, standard (analyzable) and superior (non-analyzable).
We could potentially change skills as a whole but that devalues Build Weapons considerably considering the build that keeps the credits flowing is the consumables such as ammunition. I think that is a weakness that would have to be accounted for without unbalancing things. What would you suggest there?
[/quote]
Even putting aside the ammo question, I don't think Build Weapons is weak, as everyone needs 3-6 of them and sometimes a second set. Compared to shields or engines or reactors, that's pretty sweet.
Anyway, yeah, it would be nice if TS (and PS) had a better solution to "where am I going to get ammo every hour?", whatever form that might take. (It's a big enough pain to my PS that he uses beams instead of what he's "supposed to".) -
[quote name='Kyp' timestamp='1303481606' post='39619']
Or, you can work with others, and make a deal of some kind. In any case, an explorer shouldn't be building weapons. Explorers won't be getting more than two build skills. You'd have to give me a really convincing (and balanced!) reason to change it, though of course I'll step back and let Lannister continue, he will bring your concerns to our meeting.
[/quote]
Clarification: I don't think anyone has said that TS or PS need to have [i]Build Weapons[/i], but rather some form of [i]Build Ammo[/i].
And since that's been kicked around before and shot down, I'd like to see a compromise of having ammo vendors placed in strategic stations around the galaxy. They'd only carry 101% ammo*, but they'd carry ammo for a much wider variety of weapons (e.g. RD weapons, proto weapons, weapons outside of the station's race). That would let PS and TS use their racial weapons without having to track down an ammo builder every hour.
* 101% so you couldn't get all the ammo prints just by visiting a ammo vendor. -
[quote name='Jarod' timestamp='1300331044' post='36715']
Who is getting the better deal here?
[/quote]
If you feel warriors are getting a raw deal, please feel free to make a proposal that might improve the situation. Nothing says we can only consider ideas on one front at a time.
[quote name='Jarod' timestamp='1300331044' post='36715']
I don't see what is driving this thread. What is it that's broken that these proposals intend to fix?
[/quote]
A fair question.
[list=1]
[*]Interaction between players is good.
[*]Other than a handful of ammo-related ores, miners and component builders don't interact much. For a healthy and dynamic economy, one might expect a food chain of ore providers -> component builders -> item builders -> item users (everyone). (Not unlike the real world: mined iron ore -> bulk steel -> auto chassis -> finished car -> consumers.)
[*]One reason for this lack of interaction is that ripped or vendor-purchased ores are every bit as good as mined ores.
[*]Hence a proposal to make miner-provided ores provide an extra bonus, increasing demand (i.e. a reason to interact) without creating an annoying absolute dependency.
[/list]
Now, given that components and ammo are always 200%, I'm not sure what that bonus should be. But there are some ideas being kicked around in this thread. -
[quote name='Yuritau' timestamp='1300240328' post='36632']
Component building automatically produces 200% components, so upscale ores can't have any effect on component quality. (and you can't remove the auto 200% from component building without upsetting every trader)
[/quote]
Hmm, I didn't know that 200% was automatic..I figured it worked just like every other build skill. (My personal style doesn't favor Trader classes, so I don't generally play them.) :-( Hmmmmm. -
You can buy an engine from a vendor, but it will never be as good as one you get from a Engine Builder (e.g. 100% vs. 200%).
You can buy a component from a vendor, but it will never be as good as one you get from a Component Builder.
If you rip an shield down to its components, they'll be 100% quality, not as good as a builder could provide.
So why is it that the ore you buy from a vendor by ripping a component down is every bit as good as the best miner in the game could provide? 100%
Why not...let the prospector's effective Prospect value determine the quality of the ore mined -- 100% to 200% (no random effect, though...If I mine 30 level 7 ores with an effective level 8 prospect skill, I would get, say, 30 170% ores). Let the prospector's effective Prospect Value and the ore value determine the quality of refined ores (with no random adder). And let the quality of the ores and refined ores involved in a component build add to the quality of the component?
It seems to already be built into the game: if you look at any ore, it's just always 100%.
And stack-combining? Easy. If you combine stacks of different percentages, just do a weighted average, e.g. 30@100% + 10@200% = 40@125%.
Seems easy to me, and it would increase the demand for miner-provided ores, without forcing anyone to go down that route.
Something to consider. -
Everyone's familiar with the calls on Market channel for weapons, engines, devices, shields, and reactors. But in the weeks I've been playing I have only twice seen a message like:
WTB <someOre>
There really is no open-market interchange of ores between players.
1) Why is this true? Where are the component makers getting their materials?
2) Is it indicative of a problem in the game economy, or is everything working as expected? -
Speaking of the followup mission to bring 30 Galactic, Chromium, and Discordite ores...
It takes the Galactic and Discordite from your hold, but it looks to me as if it never takes any Chromium. -
I am trying to do my 75 PS HU mission. For the first step, it says to go scan Brendan's Weft. So I run out to Brendan's Weft, click on the eyeball icon, and it tells me I've completed step 1.
Problem is, it never advances me to step 2.
Am I missing something? Anyone else see this difficulty?
Edit: found the problem, filed defect in Developer Support..Progen. Basically, you can't have two "examine a thing" missions running. -
May reduce it not to 30 but to 60.
Mind you this mission was in game when ore fields were chucking out loads more resources, so for then it was relevant. Will reduce it to 60 ores / ore type.
That should be fairly relevant.
- Enjoy the repeatable bonus missions now from the same place!
Thanks, that's a lot more reasonable, given the current mining situation.
-
I have to admit I was very underwhelmed by the reward for doing the PS 50-75 prospecting bonus mission.
Do you know how long it takes to gather 300 each of 3 different ores? Just for the Gallium I must have cleaned out the ABB mineral fields five times each. Many hours.
And all that for 20K trade exp and 15K credits?
Compare that to the PS combat mission of killing four scuttlebugs...something that takes more travel time than kill time.
I think either the reward needs to be greatly increased on the Prospecting mission or (preferably) the numbers need to go way down, perhaps by a factor of ten. 30 of three different ores would actually be enjoyable.
-
And If you think you do need to fight use beams as Fuulish said, what is the difference really to a miner if he/she has beams or their racial weapon type?
I think beams are a valid choice but somewhat limited. One challenge is that at any given Combat Level, frequently a PS or TS could be using Level-N projectiles/missiles or Level-(N-1) beams, e.g. Level-4 Projectiles or Level-3 Beams. Fighting with the lower-level weapons works, but the fights take much much longer. And this for the classes that are already weakest in combat (explorers).
Is there anyone who leveled 0-150 TS or PS using beams who can speak on the topic? Works-fine or dumb-idea?
-
Yeah, it's no big deal for a player in the know to pop over to Jove's Fury and pick up some needed devices. But I'm thinking of the novice player. Those first 10-20 levels should be pretty smooth and easy.
in Technical Support
Posted
A further note for Win7-64 users...it's not just picking a lower resolution. I've found that sometimes I get into the back-to-Megan mode, but I can get out of it by using EBConfig to change my resolution to a new setting (as administrator) -- pick one, any one; then run it again and change it back to my preferred setting (again, as administrator).
I've no idea why, but that seems to get me out of the back-to-Megan loop. This seems to pop up almost every time I get a game-patch.