barachius Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 So, there are a few reactor lines that people tend to get confused about. People tend to think that the level 7 nova upgrades to the level 8 supernova. And the Unicorn reactors with virtually identical names just gets me confused and I'm a 200% reactor builder. Nova get's confused with supernova And Unicorn gets confused with Unicorn II The issue is the highly similar names. So my suggestion is to rename them. My suggestion is to rename the Nova the Solar Flare while keeping supernova the same. And to rename the Unicorn II line the Cooler MLP X7 Pegasus and More Cooler MLP X8 Pegasus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell [BT] Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 So, there are a few reactor lines that people tend to get confused about. People tend to think that the level 7 nova upgrades to the level 8 supernova. And the Unicorn reactors with virtually identical names just gets me confused and I'm a 200% reactor builder. Nova get's confused with supernova And Unicorn gets confused with Unicorn II The issue is the highly similar names. So my suggestion is to rename them. My suggestion is to rename the Nova the Solar Flare while keeping supernova the same. And to rename the Unicorn II line the Cooler MLP X7 Pegasus and More Cooler MLP X8 Pegasus The idea has some promise, and may make the reactor lines less confusing. Solar Flare or something star related for the Nova line sounds like it would work. For the Unicorn II you would probably need to pick a different name, but the idea makes sense. Pegasus is already taken by a line of Sundari engines (pretty good travel engine). The Cooler / More Cooler thing is something that Tada-O uses in it's equipment names, but the reactors in question are by Good Earth Trading Company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GetOffMe Posted July 10, 2014 Report Share Posted July 10, 2014 (edited) I think the reactor names are fine the way they are. I don't get confused. There are many tools one can use, to get beyond the confusion. A person should only have trouble once, per run across. Should remember after that. I vote NO...for a name change Edited July 10, 2014 by GetOffMe 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mongothepawn Posted July 12, 2014 Report Share Posted July 12, 2014 I think we should include reactor failures like random reactor trips or melt downs. That would spice things up a lot. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GetOffMe Posted July 13, 2014 Report Share Posted July 13, 2014 I think we should include reactor failures like random reactor trips or melt downs. That would spice things up a lot. Now that is a berry interesting idea. I like it!!! They'll probably save that for the Vrix to do though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syberfly Posted July 20, 2014 Report Share Posted July 20, 2014 No name change needed, just build more and you will learn use Data base to help out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amethyst Posted July 21, 2014 Report Share Posted July 21, 2014 And the MLP X7 Pegasus will get confused with the Pegasus engine! And then there is the Mastiff confusion. I vote no change. The names have been like this for 10 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.