Jump to content

alurra

Former Advocates [Fmr. ADV]
  • Posts

    643
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    125.00 USD 

Everything posted by alurra

  1. Continued prayers for your speedy recovery Woodstock.
  2. Why is it pointing to sunrise.earthandbeyond.no? Mine points to sunrise.net-7.org ....
  3. Then they likely also drop the weapon you are looking for. A general rule of thumb is if it drops the ammunition it also drops the weapon.
  4. From personal experience I would suggest you continue dispatching whatever dropped the ammunition ....
  5. Yes, I know, but this is what we have now, so thought I would point you into the general direction. On the upside, the new software you just take out the checkmarks for what you don't want and narrow the search field that way That is a bit easier than scrolling through pages and pages of names at least or at a minimum allows you to ONLY search for a Emulator team member as opposed to the old style that you couldn't figure out who they were unless you looked at each member. Meh, I guess like any other software updates some things remain useless and other things get more useful. Just hope there is more to the useful side this round
  6. Go to "activity" , then to search, then click the tab to the right near the top that says 'search members'
  7. It's new to everyone. I suspect they know just about as much as we all do. Learn as you go kind of a thing.
  8. There is a bug report located here. This is more of a statement in response to those that posted in that thread as well as information for those posting in this thread so they can locate the report.   I don't see anywhere that was stated it was permanent, nor done to make things more fun or as a punishment.   What I do see, is a response stating it was to fix a recent exploit and what I hear is the implied     If that was not even close to the implied statement from Zack then my next suggestion would be that this information be posted in the ADV section and get Cimbad on the case so he can bring it to the team and see if he can help resolve the issue. That is what we have a player advocate for.
  9. What a cute lil booger. :D
  10. I would think that it would fall under the TOS because it is blocking the ability to play by doing it...   Prre, I would definitely report the individual (s) in question, even those that chose to abuse you, if their behavior warranted a report, and then let the team sort it out. If the players in question are in violation they will be told as such and I would think repeated behavior in the same field will get them nothing but troubles.   The vast majority of us are adults. Why then are some still acting like 'teeny boppers'? LOL   I echo what Efi said as well. For every single person that disrespects you, there are 10 others who will show you nothing but respect, ya old codger ;)   Fly Safe!   -Alurra
  11. ..I have no answer regarding steam, but Gogogrozni, that is not hair, it is a bird on his head. :D Check out it's beak!
  12. alurra

    Node Finder

    The game code can NOT be changed.   Redd is correct in his assertion about this.   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  13. No. There is one specifically called Shu's Engine. It's a L2.
  14. Both can be done without 'breaking' the team I think. It would take folks to make bug reports on that content which is broken though. Can't fix it if nobody knows it's broken right?   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  15. Gotta agree with Efi on this one. Never seen it nor heard of it anywhere.   Fly Safe
  16. I haven't found them all myself, but I have found most.  I wont' give you specifics, but will give you a sector to look in. Happy Hunting!    1. Paramis 2. Unknown 3. Vishao's Cove 4. Carpenter 5. Arduinne 6. Grissom
  17. Yes, Syber, you are correct. When the new 'content' for DT was added to the game, that is where the 'public council' was put together. It was there, that agreements and gentlemens rules were stated regarding how things had been working prior to the public players rotating in. The representatives public or non public, had no issues with the way things worked and agreed they were happy with everything that was going on. There was a stipulation, at that time, that if for some reason DT didn't fit into the schedule proper there would be more talks to figure it out.   I should also point out that prior to the public rotating into the gentlemens agreement there was very little to no chatter on any channels, that I ever saw, regarding any of those players who weren't in the "Big 3" about raiding. When the chatter did begin the outcome is the public 'slot'.   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  18.   To summarize what you've said here:   You don't care about any raid in the current rotation agreement.   You think the current agreement is flawed and would see it changed although it has no bearing on you or the content you prefer to play.   You think a "Gentlemens Agreement" has no valid merit and nobody should follow them. Are you a lawyer by chance? Just curious.   You are annoyed by an agreement reached through multiple players to gain access to content that you have no interest in.   You think you are being forced to conform to an agreement regarding content that you have no interest in nor participate in.   You think that if no agreement is in place between the players that "it won't be so bad". Of course you have no interest in the outcome of such a 'non agreement' but that is semantics, right?   So, it appears your primary goal here is simply to gain access to the personal views of other players whom this agreement does affect.   Does that about sum up what I am reading here?   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  19. Have you already gone and had your hull upgraded to a Level 30 hull? If you did that prior to speaking with Ioanno-J then you have locked yourself out from that mission. I believe that Kerr does state something to that effect whilst speaking wtih you about going to see the "gene witch" prior to having your hull upgraded.     Fly Safe   -Alurra
  20. Holy,   If I read and understood your previous post correctly, it surmises like this for your 'poll' ....   1. Forget the rotation agreement, free for all   2. Let the rotation agreement stand the way it is currently, but the public doesn't abide by the 'rules' set by the "Big 3"   3. Let the agreement stand the way it is currently, but the public gets a second week added.   My opinions are listed in order of each point above:   1. Turns it into a free for all, which will NOT have a positive outcome for ANYONE on the server save those few who can get there first.   2. The agreement was entered into and agreed upon by ALL, not just the "Big 3". There were also representatives of the 'Public" at the meeting who agreed to the terms and conditions, so the rules apply to EVERYONE who currently participates. Granted they are not rules set by the Emu Team, however, they are 'Gentlemen's Rules' and should be heeded by all. Your statement about 'new players' just entering didn't agree to these rules, therefore shouldn't have to 'obey' them. All I can say in regards to that is, Social Order. Anarchy has never been an answer used to solve a social problem.   3. The obvious comes to mind here. Your assertions previous that they should be allowed a 2nd week with firm rotation times set in place seems rather counter productive to me.  The rest of the participants in the agreement already set their rules up to ensure the maximum play by the maximum amount of members. Should they all also get a 2nd week so that they can have a 'whenever' and a 'set time' week as well? Why is there a penalization to those who already figured out a routine that works?   So, I suppose what I would suggest, instead of a 3 tiered poll , if a poll is really needed at all is:   1. Leave the rotation as is. Let the public players work out amongst themselves the best set of times to do any raid in any given week for maximum play to all participants.   2. Give the public players a 2nd week.   Now, that being said, I go back to my original statement that the main issue here circles back onto itself that those who constitute the public players really should be enacting their own 'rules of engagement' inside of their rotation week to ensure the maximum raids for the maximum amount of players.   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  21. Kyp,   Far as I know, nobody is blocked from the raid content. I think the previous poster was reacting to the idea that another week be added to the rotation where it wouldn't appear there is enough players to warrant another week?   Hell, I might be reaching with that conclusion, but that was how I read it. *shrug*   Back to the beginning of this thread, it APPEARS that the ability to make proper times for ALL players across the 'public' field is the root cause of this thread. We all know it's a touchy subject at best because so much blood, sweat and tears went into getting a workable arrangement in the first place.   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  22. try hovering over the client in the task bar, then right click it, then hit restore .... should work
  23. I think you will find, that anyone who is caught doing this is given more than ample opportunity to answer on the character doing the work. Getting kicked off the server with the ability to log back in immediately is NOT punitive. Punitive would be banning them, and that is realm of BL.   Public messages, would be frowned up, simply because that would be putting them into the spotlight and opening them up to ridicule, which would be directly against the TOS.   Since attended macros have never really been against the rules, I suspect the team is not going to look to change that any time soon.   I am sure BL is getting reports as to what happens, when it happens and why it happens. Not much is done without follow up and follow through from what I've seen. When he gets the reports, I'm fairly sure he looks them over to see the who/what/why/where and how of it then makes a decision as to whether the player in question is warranted more than just a simple kick to the desktop. Those decisions are the ones that are punitive, not the kick from the server from a Cdev or any other dev.   Anyway, this isn't really the thread for this kind of a discussion, but I did want to air my viewpoint about what you said.   Fly Safe   -Alurra
  24. Hmmm. I underlined that one statement, Mim because unattended macros' never have and never will be acceptable. It they are attended macro's then fine, so be it, however, when you go off to work and leave your group of toons online and 'playing' the game by themselves, that is not acceptable.   As far as being targeted by a content dev or a GM. Both are part of the emulator team. I guess I fail to see your point about the person in question being caught either by a Cdev or a GM because if they were 'kicked' from the server for unattended macros, it's a clear violation of the rules no matter who caught them. I should also point out that if they were only kicked off the server, it was likely to stop the unattended macro. Only a GM has the ability to 'ban' a player for multiple infractions and if this person was banned, it was probably because they had multiple infractions ...   Just sayin' ;)   Fly Safe   Alurra
×
×
  • Create New...